<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: xcache Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Web Development and Website Management &#38; Monetization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-52266</link>
		<dc:creator>clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-52266</guid>
		<description>I followed the advise here http://www.webtlk.com/2009/01/07/how-to-make-your-blog-faster-with-xcache/

my blog uses 30% less memory and 59% less cpu now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed the advise here <a href="http://www.webtlk.com/2009/01/07/how-to-make-your-blog-faster-with-xcache/" >http://www.webtlk.com/2009/01/07/how-to-make-your-blog-faster-with-xcache/</a></p>
<p>my blog uses 30% less memory and 59% less cpu now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nepto</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-40421</link>
		<dc:creator>Nepto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-40421</guid>
		<description>OK, I see. Let me know if &amp; when you reach your limits with memory, CPU time, etc. Maybe I would be able to help you then. Good luck with your sites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I see. Let me know if &amp; when you reach your limits with memory, CPU time, etc. Maybe I would be able to help you then. Good luck with your sites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-40371</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-40371</guid>
		<description>you can still fully SSH into the box.  problem is that cpanel runs on apache and effectively creates itself as its own webserver so that even if apache is dead, cpanel will still run.  So, if i need to run apache at all, to me, there&#039;s not much sense in running another webserver software for the websites, which most likely will only cause conflicts (sharing conf files, etc).

I bought a WAY over kill server for this last upgrade (went from 2gb ram to 8gb, and wasn&#039;t topping out the 2gb hardly ever), so I&#039;ll be ok for a while, even with the extra overhead from apache.

Pow wow wowo wowow woww

lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can still fully SSH into the box.  problem is that cpanel runs on apache and effectively creates itself as its own webserver so that even if apache is dead, cpanel will still run.  So, if i need to run apache at all, to me, there&#8217;s not much sense in running another webserver software for the websites, which most likely will only cause conflicts (sharing conf files, etc).</p>
<p>I bought a WAY over kill server for this last upgrade (went from 2gb ram to 8gb, and wasn&#8217;t topping out the 2gb hardly ever), so I&#8217;ll be ok for a while, even with the extra overhead from apache.</p>
<p>Pow wow wowo wowow woww</p>
<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nepto</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-40368</link>
		<dc:creator>Nepto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-40368</guid>
		<description>With cPanel you cannot go into the system and do custom required modifications? In this case it would just one package installation for you. However you would need to alter Apache configuration as well (not sure if you can do this with cPanel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With cPanel you cannot go into the system and do custom required modifications? In this case it would just one package installation for you. However you would need to alter Apache configuration as well (not sure if you can do this with cPanel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-40342</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-40342</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I realize there&#039;s better solutions besides apache.   Problem is that I need cPanel.  I&#039;m not great at linux, and cPanel makes my life way easier, even though i realize it&#039;s weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I realize there&#8217;s better solutions besides apache.   Problem is that I need cPanel.  I&#8217;m not great at linux, and cPanel makes my life way easier, even though i realize it&#8217;s weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nepto</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-40184</link>
		<dc:creator>Nepto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/xcache-revisited/#comment-40184</guid>
		<description>Man, somone has to tell you that - try nginx. And get rid of that big fat indian. Probably, you won&#039;t need that whatever-great-cache-subsystem finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, somone has to tell you that &#8211; try nginx. And get rid of that big fat indian. Probably, you won&#8217;t need that whatever-great-cache-subsystem finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
