<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO in a world where the &#8220;SE&#8221; doesn&#8217;t &#8220;O&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Web Development and Website Management &#38; Monetization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-56812</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-56812</guid>
		<description>We live in Sacramento, not too far from Google headquarters. Our cousin works in Mountain View.

Word is that the reason there is so much mystery about Google and their &quot;system&quot; relative to SEO is that with so many computer programmers, no one person really knows what effect his or her subroutines will have on the overall database in terms of page rank or any other aspect.

That makes sense to me as a programmer. I used to work for  a State department, and over time, the programs we used were passed along from generation to generation (one generation being about a year).

It didn&#039;t take too long before a program was so large and so complex that a newbie just left the code the way it was and added a subroutine.

That meant that if something broke, it was really hard to fix it without just programming around the problem. We were slowly creating a Frankenstein monster.

It is inevitable, and in the meantime, people treated our department as if we were so smart, we had an explanation for every quirk of the system. That we were planning these effects. Nothing like that was happening at all.

Same with Google. They just don&#039;t know, even on the inside. In a way that is good. But, in another way, the rumors one hears just add to the Godlike quality of Google&#039;s reputation, when in fact, no one will ever know for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in Sacramento, not too far from Google headquarters. Our cousin works in Mountain View.</p>
<p>Word is that the reason there is so much mystery about Google and their &#8220;system&#8221; relative to SEO is that with so many computer programmers, no one person really knows what effect his or her subroutines will have on the overall database in terms of page rank or any other aspect.</p>
<p>That makes sense to me as a programmer. I used to work for  a State department, and over time, the programs we used were passed along from generation to generation (one generation being about a year).</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take too long before a program was so large and so complex that a newbie just left the code the way it was and added a subroutine.</p>
<p>That meant that if something broke, it was really hard to fix it without just programming around the problem. We were slowly creating a Frankenstein monster.</p>
<p>It is inevitable, and in the meantime, people treated our department as if we were so smart, we had an explanation for every quirk of the system. That we were planning these effects. Nothing like that was happening at all.</p>
<p>Same with Google. They just don&#8217;t know, even on the inside. In a way that is good. But, in another way, the rumors one hears just add to the Godlike quality of Google&#8217;s reputation, when in fact, no one will ever know for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Charette</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-56733</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Charette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-56733</guid>
		<description>We live in Sacramento, not too far from Google headquarters. Our cousin works in Mountain View.

Word is that the reason there is so much mystery about Google and their &quot;system&quot; relative to SEO is that with so many computer programmers, no one person really knows what effect his or her subroutines will have on the overall database in terms of page rank or any other aspect.

That makes sense to me as a programmer. I used to work for  a State department, and over time, the programs we used were passed along from generation to generation (one generation being about a year).

It didn&#039;t take too long before a program was so large and so complex that a newbie just left the code the way it was and added a subroutine.

That meant that if something broke, it was really hard to fix it without just programming around the problem. We were slowly creating a Frankenstein monster.

It is inevitable, and in the meantime, people treated our department as if we were so smart, we had an explanation for every quirk of the system. That we were planning these effects. Nothing like that was happening at all.

Same with Google. They just don&#039;t know, even on the inside. In a way that is good. But, in another way, the rumors one hears just add to the Godlike quality of Google&#039;s reputation, when in fact, no one will ever know for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in Sacramento, not too far from Google headquarters. Our cousin works in Mountain View.</p>
<p>Word is that the reason there is so much mystery about Google and their &#8220;system&#8221; relative to SEO is that with so many computer programmers, no one person really knows what effect his or her subroutines will have on the overall database in terms of page rank or any other aspect.</p>
<p>That makes sense to me as a programmer. I used to work for  a State department, and over time, the programs we used were passed along from generation to generation (one generation being about a year).</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take too long before a program was so large and so complex that a newbie just left the code the way it was and added a subroutine.</p>
<p>That meant that if something broke, it was really hard to fix it without just programming around the problem. We were slowly creating a Frankenstein monster.</p>
<p>It is inevitable, and in the meantime, people treated our department as if we were so smart, we had an explanation for every quirk of the system. That we were planning these effects. Nothing like that was happening at all.</p>
<p>Same with Google. They just don&#8217;t know, even on the inside. In a way that is good. But, in another way, the rumors one hears just add to the Godlike quality of Google&#8217;s reputation, when in fact, no one will ever know for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Cornel</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-56714</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Cornel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-56714</guid>
		<description>Canonical tag to the rescue.. Or go straight to the big G&#039;s sandboxed. Google caffiene what? Oh. that thing.. yeah yeah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canonical tag to the rescue.. Or go straight to the big G&#8217;s sandboxed. Google caffiene what? Oh. that thing.. yeah yeah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Manchester</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-56708</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-56708</guid>
		<description>No word from mr cutts, but im sure there is a reason for this 301 and canon issue-can anyone think of why its been done like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No word from mr cutts, but im sure there is a reason for this 301 and canon issue-can anyone think of why its been done like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faraz Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-52269</link>
		<dc:creator>Faraz Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-52269</guid>
		<description>They can do this because they are Google. What we SEO analysts do, we do to please G.

And the reason all of us try to rank on G rather than on bing.com or yahoo.com (despite that fact that G is constantly making it difficult for us with their constant algorithm changes) is that 85% of the poeple use Google...

So google can have messed up domains.. but we cant

same is the case with their adsesne domain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can do this because they are Google. What we SEO analysts do, we do to please G.</p>
<p>And the reason all of us try to rank on G rather than on bing.com or yahoo.com (despite that fact that G is constantly making it difficult for us with their constant algorithm changes) is that 85% of the poeple use Google&#8230;</p>
<p>So google can have messed up domains.. but we cant</p>
<p>same is the case with their adsesne domain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-52259</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-52259</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say exceptionally well...   but I&#039;m doing ok.   It&#039;s a tough market out there right now.   No one wants to pay good money for quality work it seems.   I find myself out bid all the time, only to later be contacted again to clean up someone&#039;s hack job.

Like anything else, you get what you pay for :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say exceptionally well&#8230;   but I&#8217;m doing ok.   It&#8217;s a tough market out there right now.   No one wants to pay good money for quality work it seems.   I find myself out bid all the time, only to later be contacted again to clean up someone&#8217;s hack job.</p>
<p>Like anything else, you get what you pay for <img src='http://skeymedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://skeymedia.com/seo-in-a-world-where-the-se-doesnt-o/comment-page-1/#comment-52244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeymedia.com/why-bother-with-seo/#comment-52244</guid>
		<description>read somewhere that you&#039;ve been doing wonders being an entrepreneur ??

good going, how did you manage to exceptionally well Brian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read somewhere that you&#8217;ve been doing wonders being an entrepreneur ??</p>
<p>good going, how did you manage to exceptionally well Brian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
